Affirmative Action Essay -- essays research papers

Affirmative pull through is any effort taken to fly off the handle opportunity for women or racial, ethnic and national origin minorities by using membership in those conventions that have been subject to disparity as a consideration. The ordinal Amendment states that no person in the United earths shall, on the give of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any political platform or activity receiving federal official financial assistance. As a result, Affirmative action is not self-consistent with the ordinal Amendment. In this essay, I give first discuss the usurpation of Affirmative Action against the Fourteenth Amendment. Second, how Affirmative Action helps peerless group of great deal while leaving out the other groups of plenty.Affirmative Action has occurred in several cases throughout the Americans history and the case that I will be referring to is Regents of th e University of California v. Bakke. This case presents a challenge to the special introductions program of the Medical School of the University of California at Davis, which is designed to assure the admission of a specified number of students from certain minority groups (253). In 1973 and 1974, Allan Bakke, a white male, who utilise twice to the Medical School of the University of California at Davis, was rejected stock-still though his grade point average and MCAT hit were higher than most of the applicants. With the fact that applicants that were admitted with the special admissions program had lower scores, Bakke supposed that the Medical Schools special admissions program operated to exclude him from the drill on the basis of his race (258). This, he stated, violates his rights under the Equal safeguard article of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Equal Protection Clause states that No State shalldeny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal breastplate of the laws . The guarantee of equal protection cannot mean one thing when applied to one individual and something else when applied to a person of another color. If two are not accorded the uniform protection, then it is not equal (260). If everybody is guaranteed the same protection under the Constitution, then no one should be enured differently at the University. Hence, Affirmative Action violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendmen... ...t wrong doings then this would lead to reverse discrimination. flat though Affirmative Action was created to help the less fortunate people to have a chance to succeed in the society, it still separates one certain groups from another thus giving one certain groups more(prenominal) opportunity to succeed and leaving the other groups behind. Because of the special program in the Medical School of the University of California at Davis, Bakke was rejected because of his race. This decision do by the University is discrimination. Ther efore, Affirmative Action violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.In conclusion, the existent of Affirmative Action is not consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment. I strongly disagree on having Affirmative Action even though it can help the less fortunate people plainly also at the same time discriminate the others. It all started with the discrimination during the earlier years and now it is the time to fix the wrong. Having a various college cause to learn different things about the world, you need different people with different opinion or perspective. (President of Princeton).