James Moor - Computer Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

James wharf - Computer Ethics - Essay Example269). Thus, individuals are empowered to perform a large number of operations previously unavailable to them. An example might be the ability to make microloans to individuals in developing countries an ability that most mess in developed countries did not have 20 to 30 years ago. As ethical philosophers have pointed out for centuries, even though one piece of ass perform a certain action that does not necessarily mean one ought to perform that action. Given this basis for secures discussion of calculator ethics, it waits that Moor successfully argues for special consideration of calculating machine ethics as a specialized area in moral philosophy. Early in his essay, Moor introduces the concept of a policy vacuum, which limits the publics ability to utilize the potential of computer technology. A policy vacuum is an absence of formally recognized public standards for how to utilize a resource. One often finds a policy vacuum where there is cutting-edge technology that the public does not seem to have a use for. A current example of a policy vacuum might be related to parkland technology, which is subject to undying political debates. Even though the technology exists, it is unclear how the public will deploy those resources and gain benefits from it. Another example of a policy vacuum whitethorn exist in developing nations where modern technology is new and not well-understood. In such a case, the country may not see the guide for the new resource and thus not capitalize on its potential. Moor also introduces the notion of a conceptual vacuum early in his paper. Although a conceptual vacuum occurs in concert with a policy vacuum, the conceptual vacuum invariably occurs before and causes the policy vacuum. That is, without a coherent conceptual theoretical account within which to formulate a policy for action, there can be no policy for action, which produces the inevitable result of a policy vacuum. A coh erent conceptual framework is necessary because one cannot, for instance, explain the benefits of high-speed broadband to the leader of a developing country who has never used, let altogether heard of, the internet. Another example of a conceptual vacuum might be, with respect to the United States, is the debate over the use of renewable energy and green technology. The consequences of a change to alternative sources of energy might not be conceptually compatible with a view of the world that does not admit of the consequences of world(a) climate change. Thus, a policy vacuum results when those who are in charge of making decisions cannot comprehend the conceptual basis of their decisions. Further into his essay, Moor begins to establish a basis for comparing the Computer Revolution with the Industrial Revolution. The reason for this comparison probably lies in the ethical dilemmas evoked by the Industrial Revolution, which Moor is trying to draw parallels with in our modern age. I n one respect, the Computer Revolution is complete the sense in which our lives have become thoroughly link up with computer technology (by means of laptop computers and mobile phones). Nevertheless, in a second sense, the Computer Revolution is not over the sense in which computer technology has yet to fully develop and fully integrate with every