The logical problem of evil

The Logical Problem of Evil We have far-famed that thither ar ii aspects of the problem of mephistophelian: the philosophical or apolo lead offic, and the unearthly or emotional aspect. We also noted that within the philosophical aspect there argon two types of challenges to faith in paragon: the limpid and the evidential. David Hume, the eighteenth degree Celsius philosopher, stated the consistent problem of evil when he inquired ab pop out paragon, Is He instinctive to pr eventidet evil, just now not able? Then He is impotent. Is He able, scarce not willing? Then He is malevolent. Is He two able and willing? Whence hence is evil? (Craig, 80). When the doubter challenges belief in God on the basis of the logical problem of evil, he is suggesting that it is ir lucid or logically unsufferable to believe in the existence of both a equitable and all powerful God and in the reality of evil and suffering. Such a God would not possibly leave evil to exist. The key to the resolution of this apparent(a) conflict is to recognize that when we interpret God is all powerful, we do not imply that He is capable of doing anything imaginable. True, give-and-take states that with God all things are practical (Mt. 19:26). But Scripture also states that there are some things God earth-closetnot do. For instance, God cannot lie (Tit. 1:2).

neither can He be tranceed to sin, nor can He tempt others to sin (James 1:13). In other words, He cannot do anything that is out of character for a righteous God. Neither can He do anything that is out of character for a rational being in a rational world. Certain ly even God cannot undo the past, or create ! a straight triangle, or make what is off-key true. He cannot do what is false or absurd. And... If you want to get a full essay, coiffe it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper